Income allocation for flow-through entities
- Applies
- FY2024 onwards
- Reviewed
- Rule
- P2-FTAL-2024.1
How is a flow-through entity's income allocated under Pillar Two?
Outside owners' share comes off first, then income goes to any PE and to group owners, or stays with a UPE or reverse hybrid entity.
Per GloBE Model Rules (Pillar Two), December 2021, Article 3.5, Allocation of Income or Loss from a Flow-through Entity
The Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of a Constituent Entity that is a Flow-through Entity is first reduced by the amount allocable to its owners that are not Group Entities and that hold their Ownership Interest directly or through a Tax Transparent Structure. It is then allocated: to a Permanent Establishment through which the business of the Entity is wholly or partly carried out, in accordance with Article 3.4; in the case of a Tax Transparent Entity that is not the Ultimate Parent Entity, the remainder to its Constituent Entity-owners in accordance with their Ownership Interests; and in the case of a Tax Transparent Entity that is the Ultimate Parent Entity, or a Reverse Hybrid Entity, the remainder to the Entity itself. These rules are applied separately with respect to each Ownership Interest, and the Flow-through Entity's own figure is reduced by the amount allocated to another Constituent Entity.
Income ends up in the same place as the tax on it. A stateless Tax Transparent Entity is left with no income of its own.
An order of allocation that is not the order of the paragraphs
The order
- First — remove what is allocable to non-Group owners (3.5.3)
- Then — to a Permanent Establishment, the Group's share of what is attributable to it (3.5.1(a))
- Then — the remainder to Constituent Entity-owners, for a Tax Transparent Entity that is not the Ultimate Parent Entity (3.5.1(b))
- Or — the remainder to the Entity itself, for an Ultimate Parent Entity or a Reverse Hybrid Entity (3.5.1(c))
- Last — the Entity's own figure is reduced by what went to other Constituent Entities (3.5.5)
Tax Transparent or Reverse Hybrid
A Flow-through Entity is fiscally transparent where it was created. It is a Tax Transparent Entity for an owner whose jurisdiction also treats it as transparent, and a Reverse Hybrid Entity for an owner whose jurisdiction treats it as opaque. The same Entity can be both, for different owners: the rule is run once for each treatment.
No reduction through a Flow-through Ultimate Parent Entity
The non-Group reduction does not apply to an Ultimate Parent Entity that is a Flow-through Entity, nor to interests held through one; Article 7.1 deals with those owners instead.
Profit shares follow the interests
Ownership Interests are read with the rights to profit attached to them, including agreements that vary the split, even where an owner's own tax law does not recognise the agreement.
Taxes follow
Covered Taxes on income removed for non-Group owners are reduced in the same proportion.
Order of testing
- 1
Inputs requiring your determination
Every input the computation reaches must be supplied; nil is entered, not left blank.
- 2
A Tax Transparent Entity that is not the Ultimate Parent Entity
The remainder goes to its Constituent Entity-owners.
- 3
A Tax Transparent Entity that is the Ultimate Parent Entity
The remainder stays with it, and Article 7.1 applies.
- 4
A Reverse Hybrid Entity
The remainder stays with it.
Examples
Illustrative scenarios — ours, not the authority’s — each computed live by this rule. Change any fact and the outcome is the rule’s, not a hand-written answer.
A partnership with minority partners and a branch
The Commentary's B LP example, in millions: income of 200, 40% held outside the group, 100 attributable to a Permanent Establishment.
Computed
Of the Flow-through Entity's Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of EUR 200,000,000, EUR 80,000,000 is removed as allocable to non-Group owners (Article 3.5.3), EUR 60,000,000 is allocated to the Permanent Establishment (Article 3.5.1(a)), and the residual of EUR 60,000,000 is allocated to its Constituent Entity-owners in accordance with their Ownership Interests as computed (Article 3.5.1(b)), because the Entity is a Tax Transparent Entity that is not the Ultimate Parent Entity. Nothing remains with the Flow-through Entity (Article 3.5.5). Covered Taxes on the income removed for non-Group owners are reduced in the same proportion. Based on the figures you supplied.
Workings
- Financial Accounting Net Income or (Loss) of the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.1 — as supplied
- EUR 200,000,000
- Allocable to non-Group ownersArticle 3.5.3 — 40% of the figure, removed before anything is allocated
- (EUR 80,000,000)
- Allocated to the Permanent EstablishmentArticle 3.5.1(a) — the Group's share of the amount attributable under Article 3.4
- (EUR 60,000,000)
- Allocated to Constituent Entity-ownersArticle 3.5.1(b) — the residual, in accordance with their Ownership Interests
- EUR 60,000,000
- Remaining with the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.5 — after what is allocated to other Constituent Entities
- EUR 0
Decided by the a tax transparent entity that is not the ultimate parent entity
The same entity as a reverse hybrid
Its owners' jurisdiction treats it as opaque: the remainder stays with the entity.
Computed
Of the Flow-through Entity's Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of EUR 200,000,000, EUR 80,000,000 is removed as allocable to non-Group owners (Article 3.5.3), EUR 60,000,000 is allocated to the Permanent Establishment (Article 3.5.1(a)), and the residual of EUR 60,000,000 is allocated to the Entity itself as computed (Article 3.5.1(c)), because it is a Reverse Hybrid Entity, which its owners' tax law treats as opaque, so its income is not taxed in their hands. Based on the figures you supplied.
Workings
- Financial Accounting Net Income or (Loss) of the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.1 — as supplied
- EUR 200,000,000
- Allocable to non-Group ownersArticle 3.5.3 — 40% of the figure, removed before anything is allocated
- (EUR 80,000,000)
- Allocated to the Permanent EstablishmentArticle 3.5.1(a) — the Group's share of the amount attributable under Article 3.4
- (EUR 60,000,000)
- Allocated to the Entity itselfArticle 3.5.1(c) — the residual stays with the Entity
- EUR 60,000,000
- Remaining with the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.5 — after what is allocated to other Constituent Entities
- EUR 60,000,000
Decided by the a reverse hybrid entity
A wholly owned transparent holding entity
No outside owners and no Permanent Establishment: everything goes to the owners.
Computed
Of the Flow-through Entity's Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of EUR 45,000,000, EUR 0 is removed as allocable to non-Group owners (Article 3.5.3), EUR 0 is allocated to the Permanent Establishment (Article 3.5.1(a)), and the residual of EUR 45,000,000 is allocated to its Constituent Entity-owners in accordance with their Ownership Interests as computed (Article 3.5.1(b)), because the Entity is a Tax Transparent Entity that is not the Ultimate Parent Entity. Nothing remains with the Flow-through Entity (Article 3.5.5). Covered Taxes on the income removed for non-Group owners are reduced in the same proportion. Based on the figures you supplied.
Workings
- Financial Accounting Net Income or (Loss) of the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.1 — as supplied
- EUR 45,000,000
- Allocable to non-Group ownersArticle 3.5.3 — 0% of the figure, removed before anything is allocated
- EUR 0
- Allocated to the Permanent EstablishmentArticle 3.5.1(a) — the Group's share of the amount attributable under Article 3.4
- EUR 0
- Allocated to Constituent Entity-ownersArticle 3.5.1(b) — the residual, in accordance with their Ownership Interests
- EUR 45,000,000
- Remaining with the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.5 — after what is allocated to other Constituent Entities
- EUR 0
Decided by the a tax transparent entity that is not the ultimate parent entity
A transparent Ultimate Parent Entity
A partnership at the top of the group: no non-Group reduction, and Article 7.1 applies to what it keeps.
Computed
Of the Flow-through Entity's Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of EUR 120,000,000, nothing is removed for non-Group owners (Article 3.5.4(a)), EUR 0 is allocated to the Permanent Establishment (Article 3.5.1(a)), and the residual of EUR 120,000,000 is allocated to the Entity itself as computed (Article 3.5.1(c)), because it is a Tax Transparent Entity that is the Ultimate Parent Entity, whose owners are not Constituent Entities; Article 7.1 then applies to its GloBE Income or Loss. Based on the figures you supplied.
Workings
- Financial Accounting Net Income or (Loss) of the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.1 — as supplied
- EUR 120,000,000
- Allocable to non-Group ownersArticle 3.5.4(a) — no reduction for a Flow-through Entity that is the Ultimate Parent Entity
- EUR 0
- Allocated to the Permanent EstablishmentArticle 3.5.1(a) — the Group's share of the amount attributable under Article 3.4
- EUR 0
- Allocated to the Entity itselfArticle 3.5.1(c) — the residual stays with the Entity
- EUR 120,000,000
- Remaining with the Flow-through EntityArticle 3.5.5 — after what is allocated to other Constituent Entities
- EUR 120,000,000
Decided by the a tax transparent entity that is the ultimate parent entity
Try it
Supply the facts and this rule computes the outcome in your browser, live. Leave a determination undecided and it blocks the result — it is never read as a no.
Not computed yet
3 inputs still need your determination:
- With respect to these Ownership Interests, is the Flow-through Entity a Tax Transparent Entity that is not the Ultimate Parent Entity, a Tax Transparent Entity that is the Ultimate Parent Entity, or a Reverse Hybrid Entity?
- What is the Financial Accounting Net Income or Loss of the Flow-through Entity for the Fiscal Year? Enter a loss as a negative.
- How much of that is attributable under Article 3.4 to a Permanent Establishment through which the Entity's business is wholly or partly carried out? Give the whole amount, before any share of non-Group owners, and nil if there is no Permanent Establishment.
Computed in your browser from the figures you supply. Nothing is sent anywhere, and the result is a computation against a rule — reference, not tax advice.
Sources
GloBE Model Rules (Pillar Two), December 2021 — Article 3.5, Allocation of Income or Loss from a Flow-through Entity
The article this rule encodes
https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/12/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-of-the-economy-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-pillar-two_eed81a23/782bac33-en.pdfGloBE Model Rules (Pillar Two), December 2021 — Article 10.2, definitions of Flow-through Entity, Tax Transparent Entity and Reverse Hybrid Entity
The treatments Article 3.5.1 distinguishes
https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/12/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-of-the-economy-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-pillar-two_eed81a23/782bac33-en.pdfConsolidated Commentary to the GloBE Model Rules (May 2026) — Commentary to Article 3.5
Paragraphs 204 to 233: the order in 206 to 208, the B LP example in 228 and 229, and Article 3.5.4(b) in 232.1
https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2026/05/tax-challenges-arising-from-the-digitalisation-of-the-economy-consolidated-commentary-to-the-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-2026_24289ddf/4377e89f-en.pdf